Re-thinking ideas with public intervention

Abstract

Every city has its own identity that allows people to accept or adapt it as it is. For instance, London was master planned by many architects in the past, but do any public interactions between architects and the general public actually occur? This argument does not imply that they make as they want; the council permits them to define a brief, which is always what someone follows, but since then design has evolved into a field that is both adaptable and a subject of learning, such as how people adapt social media chats or any reels.

Let’s say the same context for design today’s on artist perspective. Many people find an artist’s work to be a powerful tool for self-exploration and self-discovery, allowing artists to express their inner world and identity. However this doesn’t mean their work is a static representation of themselves. It’s a dynamic process of interpretation and re-interpretation. The city spaces are today’s identity of someone’s cultural history but do we really think it communicates well, or does it just stand on its own and we accept the question or a judgment? It might look like or speak for a question that an artist wants to ask the world. 

About

Himanshe Mewada | Interior Architect

Himanshu Mewada began his career in design with a curiosity about how people connect with new ideas in the rapidly evolving fields of design and technology. He’s witnessed how emerging design disciplines sit at the forefront of innovation, advancing possibilities in execution and contributing to societal development.

His work explores a fundamental question: can design as a discipline truly enable people to harness their creative thinking potential in our rapidly changing world? Through his practice, he investigates how individual approaches to understanding design can reach and inspire the next generation of design professionals.